Louis XIV of France vs. the Stuart Kings of England:
Why did the Stuart kings fail, and Louis XIV succeed?
        William Jefferson Clinton was one of the outstandingest presidents to rein the United States as opposed to the Bushs. Clinton proved to the orb our short letter by way of control, economic growth, and policies ranging from Israel to social security. The Bushs proved to the world that they won the election. Louis XIV and the Stuart Kings also compare in equal ways. Louis XIV was a sound leader whose foresight and cite led to the greatness of France, along with delegating authority to great economic and military leaders. The Stuart Kings possessed no foresight or character, many thought of them as stupid and stubborn, and the way they g everywherened their nation was reckless. Louis XIV prospered through absolute control, economic growth, and military reform. Where as, the Stuart Kings trouble was due to no real control, economic turmoil, and civil war. The nigh important factor in the success of Louis XIV and the distress of the Stuart Kings was control.
        Louis XIV achieved absolute control through supervision, location of brilliance, and the mental picture he portrayed to his subjects.
Louis XIV always took the time to puzzle out what was going on in public and hole-and-corner(a) matters by means of spies, tale-bearers, and even written correspondences. Even a whisper of wrong doing and Louis would ruin those whom came under suspicion. After the Fronde (1648-1652), a rebellion against the government of Louis XIV, Louis learned that he needed to hang in his nobility under control. He accomplished this by requiring his nobility to attend his court in Versailles, where he could watch over the nobles and make them study such things as etiquette. They were too picky learning to plot against him.
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.